2 X FunSaver Disposable Camera with Flash 800 ISO

Product Information

Mirrorless System Lenses Canon RF Lenses Fujifilm X Mount Lenses Nikon Z Lenses Sony E Mount Lenses Sony G Master Lenses L Mount Lenses Micro Four Thirds Lenses Canon EF-M Lenses There isn’t anything particularly special about the Kodak FunSaver. So I’ve done a mixture of both, I’ve sent the rolls of film off to my professional lab and I’ve self-developed as well. Like nearly all single use cameras, it has a very simple plastic lens, manual film advance, and 27 exposures.

Normally you won’t see the film if you just turn in the camera to your developer; however, if you take the film out of the camera yourself this is what you’ll see.With this film, a very good exposure is guaranteed for almost any daylight situation, probably indoors you already require the use of flash, but even so, if for some reason you forget to recharge it, you will still have some results. Packaging includes a cardboard sleeve that fits over the camera, which goes inside the sealed wrapper. And perhaps that’s what makes it an overall choice — it is simply exactly what you expect and works for almost everyone’s needs. The most common of these disposables (at least in the United States) is the Kodak FunSaver, which also happens to be the camera that introduced me to photography.

Most purchases from business sellers are protected by the Consumer Contract Regulations 2013 which give you the right to cancel the purchase within 14 days after the day you receive the item.My Mom went back to using disposable cameras this year as she got tired of fooling around with a digital camera that was always dead when she wanted to use it, or it didn’t focus right, or recorded video when she just wanted a still image. A film that has been on the market for 30 years and mounted in a truly advanced camera shines with its performance. The DarkRoom will send them to a recycling facility to recover much of the materials At first glance, the FunSaver looks like a toy. If you rely on your local developer/printer, you will probably not get anything close to what you see here, the reason being they scan the negatives too quickly, and that results in a poor light range from deep shadows to bright skies; plus the colors are not really accurate/punchy in my opinion. You will probably notice that the edges in the photos are somewhat less defined than in the center, and it should also be noted that the chromatic aberration will be visible throughout the photo.